Participant Resources

Expose Article

​​When Gear Fails the Test: Ridgeline Expedition’s Durability Crisis

By Jenna Alvarez — Special to Outside

For nearly half a century, Ridgeline Expedition has been synonymous with rugged dependability. From the Whitaker brothers’ first AlpineGuard tent to the AeroWeave™ jackets that became a staple of backcountry guides, the Oregon-based company built its reputation on a simple creed: “gear you can trust with your life.” But today, that reputation is fraying — sometimes literally — under the weight of its own sustainability ambitions.

At issue is Regenerate ’30, Ridgeline’s widely publicized pledge to use only recycled or regenerative materials by the end of this decade. Launched in 2021 with fanfare and glowing press, the initiative positioned Ridgeline as an industry leader in eco-conscious gear. The company plastered its website and retail stores with slogans like “The future of gear is regenerative” and “Sustainability you can wear.”

But a growing chorus of guides, climbers, and longtime customers now claims the new gear simply doesn’t last.

Zippers, Seams, and Shelters Failing in the Field

On a June expedition to the North Cascades, veteran climbing guide Erica Reynolds watched the zipper on her Ridgeline Traverse shell split open halfway through a storm. “I’ve used Ridgeline since the ’90s, and this was the first time I felt unsafe because of their gear,” Reynolds told Outside. “The jacket was brand new. I expected it to last five years. It didn’t survive five weeks.”

She’s not alone. In interviews with more than a dozen outdoor professionals and weekend adventurers, we heard consistent complaints: waterproof membranes breaking down in a single season, pack straps fraying under moderate loads, tent flysheets tearing in routine winds. Several respondents contrasted their new gear with older Ridgeline products still in rotation after decades of abuse.

“Ridgeline used to be bombproof,” said Jason Cook, a Denali guide who swears by his 2004 Ridgeline AlpineGuard tent. “Now? I can’t recommend them to my clients. If your gear fails at 14,000 feet, you don’t get a second chance.”

Independent Tests Raise Alarming Questions

To test these claims, Outside sent five pieces from Ridgeline’s latest “R30” line — two shells, a midweight fleece, a backpack, and a three-season tent — to an independent materials lab in Colorado. The results were stark:

• The Traverse shell lost 40% of its waterproofing after 12 standard wash cycles, far faster than comparable jackets from Arc’teryx and Patagonia.
  
• The pack’s recycled nylon straps showed tensile strength 18% lower than conventional nylon straps of similar weight.
  
• The R30 tent’s flysheet fabric tore at 60% of the industry’s baseline abrasion standard.
  

“These recycled fibers can perform well, but they’re not all created equal,” said Dr. Andrew Michaels, a polymer scientist who reviewed the data. “It looks like Ridgeline may have prioritized recycled content percentages over proven durability in some of these cases.”

Marketing vs. Materials

That tension — between storytelling and science — may be the heart of Ridgeline’s crisis. Internally, sources say there was intense pressure to bring R30 products to market quickly, both to meet sustainability milestones and to compete with faster-moving rivals like REI Co-op and Mountain Hardwear.

“They wanted to plant the flag,” said one former employee, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The sustainability team was pushing for higher recycled percentages. Product development warned the fabrics weren’t fully validated yet. Marketing won the argument.”

The result: gear that photographs well and ticks eco boxes but can’t consistently hold up under expedition use.

A Blow to Brand Credibility

For Ridgeline, the damage is more than technical. It’s cultural. Customers who grew up with the brand trusted it with their lives — on ridgelines, in whiteouts, across desert traverses. That trust is now in question.

“It’s heartbreaking,” said Alex Kim, a longtime customer in Portland. “My first Ridgeline pack went with me everywhere. I still have it. But the new one I bought last year is already falling apart. It feels like they’re trading their soul for slogans.”

The irony is bitter: the very initiative meant to secure Ridgeline’s future as a sustainability leader may be unraveling the legacy it was built on.

Company Response

In a written statement, Ridgeline Expedition acknowledged receiving “higher-than-expected warranty claims” on certain R30 products but insisted that durability remains a core value.

“We stand by our Regenerate ’30 commitment and are actively investing in next-generation recycled fabrics to ensure durability meets or exceeds our legacy standards,” said COO Brittain James. “Every innovation cycle has growing pains, and we are committed to learning and improving.”

CEO Daniel Whitaker, grandson of co-founder Samuel, struck a more personal tone in a recent internal memo leaked to Outside: “The Whitaker name has always stood for gear that lasts a lifetime. If we’ve fallen short, it’s on us to fix it.”

What’s Next for Ridgeline?

Industry analysts say the company faces a critical decision: slow the pace of Regenerate ’30 to rebuild durability standards, or double down and risk further erosion of customer trust.

“Once a brand loses credibility on durability, it’s very hard to win back,” said analyst Maria Delgado of GearWatch. “People can forgive a delayed product launch. They won’t forgive a tent that fails in a storm.”

For Ridgeline Expedition, the storm is here. Whether they can weather it — and emerge with both their sustainability vision and their reputation intact — may determine whether the Whitaker family legacy endures or unravels.